| 刘瑶.基于模糊层次分析法的护理学研究生课程思政的全生命周期评价指标体系的构建[J].上海护理,2026,26(7): |
| 基于模糊层次分析法的护理学研究生课程思政的全生命周期评价指标体系的构建 |
| Construction of a Whole Life Cycle Evaluation Index System for Ideological and Political Education in Nursing Postgraduate Courses Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process |
| 投稿时间：2025-04-21 修订日期：2025-10-30 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 护理学，课程思政，指标体系，全生命周期理论，模糊层次分析法 |
| 英文关键词:Nursing Ideological and political education in courses Index system Whole life cycle theory Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process |
| 基金项目:河北省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目“OBE理念下基于CIPP+4R模型的课程思政评价体系构建与实践”（2022GJJG612）；研究生教育教学改革研究项目“全生命周期视域下研究生课程思政评价体系的CIPP 模型构建与实践研究”（YJG2023057） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 88 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 摘要：目的 构建研究生课程思政评价指标体系，建立完善的研究生课程思政评价体系和评价机制。方法 以全生命周期理论为基础，构建护理学研究生课程思政评价指标体系，通过德尔菲专家函询确定指标，采用模糊层次分析法确定权重，并对所建立的指标体系进行实证分析。结果 构建的指标体系包括4个一级指标，12个二级指标，23个三级指标。两轮专家函询问卷回收率分别为100%（20/20）、90%（18/20）；两轮专家函询的专家权威系数均为0.85；两轮专家函询的变异系数均在0.00~0.17波动；通过计算指标体系四个一级指标的权重值分别为0.166、0.244、0.337、0.254；经实证分析，该指标体系最终得分为84.99，属于较好等级。结论 本研究构建的护理学研究生课程思政评价指标体系具有科学性和可靠性，并且通过实证分析确定了该指标体系的等级属于较好等级，可为打造一流课程思政示范课提供依据。 |
| 英文摘要: |
Construction of a Whole Life Cycle Evaluation Index System for Ideological and Political Education in Nursing Postgraduate Courses Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
:Objective? To construct an evaluation index system for ideological and political education in postgraduate courses and establish a comprehensive evaluation system and mechanism. Methods? Based on the whole life cycle theory, an evaluation index system for ideological and political education in nursing postgraduate courses was developed. Indicators were determined through the Delphi expert consultation method, and weights were assigned using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. An empirical analysis was conducted to validate the constructed index system. Results? The established index system includes 4 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators, and 23 third-level indicators. The response rates for the two rounds of expert consultation were 100% (20/20) and 90% (18/20), respectively. The expert authority coefficient for both rounds was 0.85. The variation coefficients for the two rounds ranged from 0.00 to 0.17. The calculated weights for the four first-level indicators were 0.166, 0.244, 0.337, and 0.254, respectively. The empirical analysis showed that the final score of the index system was 84.99, indicating a "good" level. Conclusion? The evaluation index system for ideological and political education in nursing postgraduate courses constructed in this study is scientific and reliable. Empirical analysis confirmed that the system is rated as "good," providing a basis for developing first-class demonstration courses in ideological and political education. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |